Maori Learners

Maori Learners
collaboration

Friday 23 March 2012

questions about access to technology and online teaching and learning

In reply to the questions –
1. lack of “buy in” in the area of foundation learning by workplace providers.
According to the Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning it states, “Only a few tertiary education organisations or workplaces in New Zealand have fully developed e-learning programmes for adults” (p. 18). Although “ e-learning programmes can transcend  the barriers of geographic location and time” (p. 22) access still not available to all because of funding.  Lankshear & Knobel  (2003) state it “needs to be addressed and used to address the interfaces that occur between literacy learning and technology”.
2. Learners in supervisory roles where computer usage is expected, get computer training.
This is a bias decision made by workplace probably because less time is needed for guidance when training supervisors and thinking that they have not got time to train others who have not been exposed to technology.
3. Learners not in supervisory roles are placed in classrooms with no use of computer resources.
Effective professional development can affect the learning culture within an organization and with reference to Timperley, Wilson and Fung (2007), Professional Development (PD) programmes may occur over long periods of time therefore having large investments of time and capital. “Staff need to be counseled, mentored and tutored in situated context”. (Fletcher, J., Nicholas, K., & Davis, N. 2010). The fact that the tutors have not undergone PD, or that there is no time to train the learners, might  be the problem  with access and why learners are in classrooms with no use of computer resources.
4. TEC assessments as non-adaptive versions rather than online.
 Surprisingly having read Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(1), they speak about supporting adults to address their own learning and with reference to page 20, there are no comments on forms of assessment , whether online or non- adaptive versions, yet on page 24 they speak about “drag and drop” form of assessment.
5. Workplace LLN is a tightrope of balancing learner, provider and workplace expectations.
“Introducing and integrating e-learning  into adult education and training is a complex process” (p. 25).
References:
Fletcher, J., Nicholas, K., & Davis, N. (2010). Supporting adults to address their literacy needs using e-learning. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(1), 17-29.
Lankshear, C., &  Knobel, K. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham, UK: Open university.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

1 comment:

  1. I have been following other people’s blogs for example
    Observations from the Unconference: Near Future of Learning in Australia
    February 19, 2012 By Alison Bickford

    o Alison Bickford says:
    March 7, 2012 at 9:41 am

    Hi Ethni. Thank you for your comment, and my apologies for my delay in responding. Today is my blogging day

    Thank you for introducing me to your blog. I look forward to watching it develop as your ideas evolve. As you can see from my blog, I don’t have a great deal of experience in teaching and learning in education contexts. My experience is in organisational learning where different motivations, opportunities, issues and technology options avail. For example, the focus of organisational learning strategy is typically to improve employee productivity and not to develop better skills in learning (although I believe there is scope to teach employees how to learn in an organisation). This is a part of your argument on ‘context’ and how context impacts learning.

    Best wishes in your research endeavours, and I look forward to seeing more of you online.
    Kind regards, Alison

    ReplyDelete