Maori Learners

Maori Learners
collaboration

Friday 9 March 2012

access to technology

Online teaching and learning using multi-media can be very successful providing that there is adequate internet connection in the community for the service provide. “Access” is the operative word.  Certain countries do experience connectivity as far as adequate internet connection is concerned. For example in South Africa, internet is expensive for many residing there although many competitors have entered the horizons and hopefully the situation of cheaper connectivity may improve. The climatic conditions also add to problems associated with connectivity as heavy thunderstorms blow out the modems if they are switched on.
Our focus on online teaching and learning is situated in Aotearoa New Zealand context and the access to computers and internet connections have to be taken into consideration when planning online teaching and learning using multimedia. Web 2.0 is a social networking site and allows users to interact and collaborate with each other when viewing blogs and sharing video uploads. Once again, access to computers and good internet connections is needed.
When looking at resources and assessment tools used in various workplace, community-based settings and or respective institutions that promote courses for adults, there are very little provisions made for online resources and assessments. This situation of a lack of online teaching and learning resources may be because of a lack of funding.

Setting up lesson and activities to match the learning outcomes and having to find resources that are conducive to situated adult learning can become time consuming if the educator is not skilled in online teaching and learning strategies using multimedia or if there is a lack of access to computers. Using social networking site and interacting and collaborating with each other when viewing blogs and sharing video up-loads needs computers and good internet connections for this activity to take place.
Adult learners who are not exposed to computers and online activities because of a lack of resources in their homes might find difficulty in understanding concepts and terminology. Searching information may be too daunting for these adults. Another obstacle could be that because information is through the written word, adults with a lack of or very little reading, writing and keyboards, find difficulty in understanding instructions.
We live in this dynamic changing world where technology changes constantly. Affecting adults is the economic paradigm shift. Computers, mobile phones, iPods, iPads, tablets as well as all software and applications are constantly being upgraded that these changes are very difficult for providers of adult education including individuals to maintain or fund. This makes access to new technology even more difficult. New technology scares the older generation and therefore the use of the new technology suddenly does not become “important” however it blurs the ideas of not knowing how to go about using new technology. Face Book, the social media networking site, has just changed personal profile setting to time-line settings and this application takes a while for adults to adjust to. Web 2.0 has applications that allows for active interaction and collaboration on the World Wide Web by making use of blogs, wikis, and other applications. Yet, access to computers and networking sites is imperative for all these forms of technology to be effective.

Reference
Sork, T. (2000). Planning educational programmes. In A. L. Wilson & E. R. Hayes (eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education. (pp. 171-190). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

6 comments:

  1. Hi Ethni
    this communication medium seems to suit you. Having access to digital technology is a topic worthy of discussion. Learning styles rather than age may be a factor in using new technology. I am keen to read your two questions (posted in the announcement and in the Learning Space weeks 1-7). These will give yu two more blog spot topics to write about- One is your first question and the other your choice of second question from another studnet.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Ethni
    I did make a comment the other day but it seems to have somehow been deleted. I was wondering how you see access issues in workplaces and the Foundation sector in particular restricting Adult LLN learners access to and uses for Web 2.0 tools. Also do you see the employers' attitudes as being positive towards both the uses for Web 2.0 tools and also the technologies involved?

    ReplyDelete
  3. In reply to the questions –
    1. lack of “buy in” in the area of foundation learning by workplace providers.
    According to the Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning it states, “Only a few tertiary education organisations or workplaces in New Zealand have fully developed e-learning programmes for adults” (p. 18). Although “ e-learning programmes can transcend the barriers of geographic location and time” (p. 22) access still not available to all because of funding. Lankshear & Knobel (2003) state it “needs to be addressed and used to address the interfaces that occur between literacy learning and technology”.
    2. Learners in supervisory roles where computer usage is expected, get computer training.
    This is a bias decision made by workplace probably because less time is needed for guidance when training supervisors and thinking that they have not got time to train others who have not been exposed to technology.
    3. Learners not in supervisory roles are placed in classrooms with no use of computer resources.
    Effective professional development can affect the learning culture within an organization and with reference to Timperley, Wilson and Fung (2007), Professional Development (PD) programmes may occur over long periods of time therefore having large investments of time and capital. “Staff need to be counseled, mentored and tutored in situated context”. (Fletcher, J., Nicholas, K., & Davis, N. 2010). The fact that the tutors have not undergone PD, or that there is no time to train the learners, might be the problem with access and why learners are in classrooms with no use of computer resources.
    4. TEC assessments as non-adaptive versions rather than online.
    Why this is so, I really do not know. Surprisingly having read Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(1), they speak about supporting adults to address their own learning and with reference to page 20, there are no comments on forms of assessment , whether online or non- adaptive versions, yet on page 24 they speak about “drag and drop” form of assessment.
    5. Workplace LLN is a tightrope of balancing learner, provider and workplace expectations.
    “Introducing and integrating e-learning into adult education and training is a complex process” (p. 25).
    References:
    Fletcher, J., Nicholas, K., & Davis, N. (2010). Supporting adults to address their literacy needs using e-learning. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(1), 17-29.
    Lankshear, C., & Knobel, K. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham, UK: Open university.
    Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would like to edit my reply because the spacing is not correct. How do I do this?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Ethni

    Your reply could form a whole blog and in fact as it answers one of Fionna's questions I do suggest you turn it into a blog. Replies and comments I suggest are meant to be shorter in length and more informal in style.

    ReplyDelete
  6. hi Ethni
    I did leave a further response to your comments re workplace teaching, however, once again the comment seems to have been deleted.
    Regards Fionna

    ReplyDelete